Ronald W. Chapman II 

How to Sue the Federal Government: A Primer (2024)

How to Sue the Federal Government: A Comprehensive Guide by Expert Attorneys

How to Sue the Federal Government: A Comprehensive Guide by Expert Attorneys

Table of Contents

Introduction: Understanding Sovereign Immunity and the Right to Sue the Government

Sovereign immunity is a legal doctrine that traditionally protects the government from being sued without its consent. This principle has deep roots in English common law and has been a significant aspect of the American legal system. However, various legal challenges and legislative acts, including landmark cases and the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), have modified this absolute protection, allowing individuals to sue the government under specific conditions.

Article III, Section 2, Clause 1: Judicial Power and Sovereign Immunity

Article III of the U.S. Constitution establishes the judicial power of the federal courts. Specifically, Article III, Section 2, Clause 1 states:

"The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;—to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;—to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between two or more States;—between a State and Citizens of another State,—between Citizens of different States,—between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects."

This clause implies that federal courts have jurisdiction over cases involving the United States as a party, including those brought against the federal government as a defendant. However, the doctrine of sovereign immunity can limit such suits.

While state sovereign immunity is rooted in part in the Eleventh Amendment, no provision of the Constitution expressly grants the federal government immunity from suit. Instead, federal sovereign immunity is considered a common law doctrine derived from pre-Founding English law. Since the early years of the Republic, the Supreme Court has consistently held that the United States may not be sued unless it consents. This doctrine applies to actions of federal agents or employees, federal agencies, and government corporations.

Key Cases on Sovereign Immunity

  • United States v. Lee (1882): Established that individuals could sue the government for constitutional violations, despite sovereign immunity.
  • Thacker v. Tennessee Valley Authority (2019): Affirmed that waivers of sovereign immunity must come from Congress, rejecting a separation of powers challenge to a statute waiving immunity for a government-owned corporation.

The Federal Tort Claims Act: A Pathway to Justice

Overview of the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA):

The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) of 1946 marked a significant shift in the doctrine of sovereign immunity. This act allows individuals to sue the federal government for certain tortious acts committed by federal employees. Before the FTCA, the government's sovereign immunity often left individuals without recourse for injuries caused by government actions. The FTCA opened a pathway for individuals to seek compensation, albeit under specific conditions and limitations.

Key Provisions of the FTCA:

  • Waiver of Sovereign Immunity: The FTCA partially waives the government’s immunity, permitting lawsuits for negligence or wrongful acts by federal employees acting within their official duties.
  • Scope of Employment: The act applies only to actions taken within the scope of federal employment.
  • Negligence Requirement: Claimants must prove that the government employee's negligence caused their injury or damage.

Types of Claims Allowed Under the FTCA:

  • Injury Claims: Physical injuries resulting from negligent acts by government employees.
  • Property Damage: Damage to personal property due to government employee actions.
  • Medical Malpractice: Injuries caused by negligent medical treatment at federal healthcare facilities.
  • Motor Vehicle Accidents: Collisions involving federal vehicles, such as those operated by postal workers or military personnel.
  • Slip and Fall Accidents: Injuries sustained on government property due to unsafe conditions.

When Can You Sue a Federal Agency: Key Cases

Axon Enterprise Inc v. Federal Trade Commission

Background of the Case:

On April 14, 2023, the Supreme Court ruled in Axon Enterprise Inc v. Federal Trade Commission. Axon Enterprise, a company specializing in law enforcement technology, was subject to an FTC antitrust enforcement action. Axon challenged the constitutionality of the FTC's structure and the use of administrative law judges (ALJs) in its proceedings.

Legal Arguments:

Axon argued that the FTC’s ALJs were unconstitutionally insulated from presidential oversight due to their protection from removal. Axon’s claim was based on separation-of-powers principles, asserting that the ALJs’ insulation violated the Constitution.

Supreme Court Decision:

The Supreme Court held that district courts have jurisdiction to hear constitutional challenges to the FTC's structure while enforcement proceedings are ongoing. Justice Kagan, writing for the majority, emphasized that litigants should not have to wait until administrative proceedings conclude to bring such challenges. The Court applied the Thunder Basin factors, concluding that Axon’s challenge to the constitutionality of the FTC’s structure was appropriate for district court review.

Unlock the Secrets of Federal Criminal Defense – Free Chapter Inside!

Discover the untold strategies used to secure acquittals in federal criminal cases. Authored by Ronald W. Chapman II, a leading federal defense attorney, this book provides insider knowledge on navigating and overcoming federal investigations.

Fight the Feds Book Cover

Inside the Book:

  • The secrets to the success of hundreds of dismissals and acquittals
  • Learn the secrets defense attorneys use to secure acquittals
  • Get inside federal prosecution tactics
  • Never before told insights into the nation's highest profile cases

Curious to learn more? Click here to preview a free chapter of "Fight the Feds: Unraveling Federal Criminal Investigations" and start reading today!

Preview a Free Chapter

Ronald W. Chapman II 

Winning Trial Attorney | Legal Analyst | Author

“One of the most talented attorneys I have seen in my 20 years on the bench” Federal Judge

Experienced Lawyers for Criminal Cases | Ronald W. Chapman II | Top Criminal Defense Attorney Specializing in Criminal Law | Contact Ron for Expert Legal Representation Near You

“He’s a Federal Criminal Defense Attorney extraordinaire” Neil Cavuto, Fox News Host

Recent Results

  • Ronald W. Chapman II secured a complete acquittal for Dr. Loey Kousa, who faced charges of healthcare fraud, drug trafficking, and maintaining a drug-involved premises. This triumph is particularly noteworthy as Chapman defeated the Department of Justice's Healthcare Fraud Strike Force, showcasing his exceptional legal acumen and dedication to justice.

    More details

  • Ronald W. Chapman II successfully secured a complete acquittal for Dr. Kendall Hansen, who faced severe allegations from the Department of Justice, including healthcare fraud and drug trafficking. This victory against the DOJ Strike Force underscores Chapman's formidable legal expertise and his unwavering commitment to defending his clients' rights and reputations.

    Learn More

  • Ron stunnud lhe DOJ with a full acquittal in United States v. Bothra a complex healthcare fraud indictment.

    Read More

  • Dismissal of two federal opioid death counts in United States v. Sachy. (Read More)

  • Full acquittal in United States v. Pompy a Detroit drug indictment against an interventional anesthesiologist.

    Read More

  • Full acquittal in People v. Joseph Oesterling, a mayo clinic trained physician charged with drug trafficking. (Read More)

  • United States v. McCutchen, a Detroit physician was charged in a wide ranging Oxycodone drug conspiracy.

  • In United States v. Aggarwal Ron secured a full acquittal of a physician accused of drug trafficking and healthcare fraud.

    Learn More

Satisfied Clients 

Ron is ferocious in the federal courtroom, watching him do his thing was like watching a fighter in his prime
— Client C.R. (Full Acquittal)
This is who you want in a federal courtroom
— Dr. Kendall Hansen (Full Acquittal)
Ron was our knight in shining armor. Without question he was born to be a leader
— Dr. Joe Oesterling (Full Acquittal)

Ron is trusted by national news networks such as BBC, NPR, FOX, NewsNation for his legal analysis

The Playbook

The ins and outs of federal criminal investigations.